Tag: documentation

  • Eventually You Compete With Yourself

    Eventually You Compete With Yourself

    The video above is two and a half minutes about dunking. One sentence in it applies to every athlete who has ever been the best person in a gym.

    “eventually, there’ll be no more dunkers to compete with. So it’s gonna be competing with yourself.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Jordan Kilganon is the most recognized figure in freestyle dunking. He said that to Polish dunker Piotr Zawiślak, who is eighteen, at The Dunk Camp in Salt Lake City. Then he added the sentence almost nobody at his level says out loud.

    “I was always scared of that moment.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Rivalry Is a Fuel Tank, Not a Power Source

    Almost every athlete gets to the top of their sport on borrowed motivation. There is a name on a wall, a teammate you cannot beat, a kid in the next county who keeps showing up in the same finals. You train because you cannot stand losing to that specific person. It works, and it works for years.

    The problem with the tank is that it empties in one of two ways, and both of them arrive without warning. Either you pass everybody, or the pool you were competing in stops existing around you. The county champion moves to a college program where the fuel is suddenly abundant again, then graduates into a masters division where there are eleven people in the country doing what she does and she beats all of them by April.

    The specific sports change. The mechanism does not. When the external standard disappears, athletes who never built an internal one drift, and the drift usually gets diagnosed as burnout when it is actually a motivation supply problem.

    The Entitlement Trap Arrives First

    Kilganon sequenced his advice carefully, and the running-out-of-rivals problem was not the first thing he brought up. He led with a warning about comfort, which shows up years earlier and takes out more careers.

    He described the trap in Piotr’s own future tense: travelling constantly, hitting crazy dunks, being one of the best in the world, and treating all of that as simply how life is now.

    “No. You can’t have that kind of attitude.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    “You need to appreciate every moment and keep earning it.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Any coach who has managed a program long enough recognizes that arc. The athlete does not quit. The athlete keeps showing up, keeps travelling, keeps getting introduced by the same accomplishments, and quietly stops paying the price that produced them. Performance holds for a season on residual fitness, then it does not.

    Kilganon’s Answer Was Mechanical

    What makes this more useful than a motivational clip is that he did not stop at naming the problem. He described the exact thing he did about it, and it was an engineering decision rather than a mindset one.

    “That’s why I invented the ball handling drills, is I can only jump so much, but I wanna keep getting better. How do I do that without jumping?”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Vertical jump is a capped resource. Everyone has a personal ceiling, training gets you close to it, and past a certain age the number falls no matter what you do. Kilganon accepted the cap on that one measurement and refused to accept it as a cap on improvement, so he chose a second measurement without a known top and moved his effort there.

    That transfers directly. A sprinter whose top speed has plateaued still has starts, turnover mechanics, race-model execution, and recovery quality. A lifter at the limit of their frame still has bar path, positioning, and how many quality sessions they can absorb in a year. A goalkeeper who is not getting more explosive still has reading the play, distribution, and communication. Find the axis without a ceiling and make that the thing you are trying to win at.

    An internal standard is much easier to hold when it is attached to something measurable. Competing with yourself sounds vague until you name the metric you are competing on.

    The Mentorship Moment Nobody Records

    Everything above happened in about ninety seconds, standing on a gym floor, between two people who had just met. That is how almost all real mentorship in sport gets delivered. Not in a program, not in a session someone paid for. On a sideline, at a meet, in a parking lot, from someone ten years ahead of you who happened to be in a talking mood.

    Then it evaporates. The athlete remembers that it was meaningful and cannot reproduce a single sentence of it eighteen months later. The specific words were the whole value, and the specific words are what goes first.

    Write them down the same day, in quotes, with the name attached. Do it for yourself, because a rule you can check against is worth more than a warm feeling. Then publish it somewhere permanent with the person’s name and credentials on the page, because a sponsor, a coach, or an AI assistant answering a question about you will read text on pages and will never find audio buried in somebody else’s video.

    The Part That Proves the Whole Thing

    Kilganon solved his ceiling problem and published the solution on YouTube. Years later, in a separate interview at the same camp, record-holding jumper Ethan Pimstone asked Piotr where his hand speed came from.

    “I’ve seen some drill at Jordan Kilganon’s channel. And I started doing it a lot.”

    Piotr Zawiślak

    Daily, for years, in Poland, off a screen. Before an important contest he brings his ball to the gym and spends an hour on those drills alone. Then he flew to Utah, met the man who invented them, and tried them next to him.

    “I was trying to do some of his drills, and I just couldn’t get it, and he was doing it with ease.”

    Piotr Zawiślak

    That chain only exists as a fact because two conversations were filmed days apart and then written down. Neither video contains the story on its own. The training-detail half is in two athletes with complementary strengths.

    It also shows what a coachable athlete looks like. The influence was already operating at full strength before either of them knew the other existed. Kilganon’s assessment of him was earned partly with Kilganon’s own material.

    “There’s nobody that’s been this young that’s doing the stuff that he’s doing.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Be Desperate While It Still Costs You Something

    The closing instruction was short.

    “Be desperate to get better all the time with all your time possible.”

    Jordan Kilganon

    Desperate is a deliberate word. It is the state of someone who has not got the thing yet. The warning underneath it is that success removes desperation as a side effect, and the athlete who does not replace it with something built on purpose has about two good seasons left after that.

    This conversation was filmed because Dennis Yu and I ran a session for 76 campers on how athletes show up on Google and in AI tools, then offered to interview anyone who wanted one. The method is documented in the repurposing system from camp. Piotr’s first-person account is meeting the reason he started, the dunk-community breakdown is about running out of people to beat, the sport-specific version is his advice to young dunkers, and the business translation is the ceiling problem.

    Somebody ten years ahead of you is going to say something like this to you at a meet this season. You will have about ninety seconds. Get the words.

  • When the Authority in Your Sport Puts You on Camera

    When the Authority in Your Sport Puts You on Camera

    The video above is four minutes of three guys talking about dunking. The thing that happens in it happens in every sport, every weekend, to athletes who then let it evaporate.

    Here is the setup. Billy Doran of Dunkademics has been filming freestyle dunkers since 2007. In that sport, his camera is the closest thing to a governing body. At The Dunk Camp in Salt Lake City, he pointed it at an eighteen-year-old from Poland named Piotr Zawiślak and gave an evaluation.

    “He’s crazy. He’s young in the game and he’s already black band. That’s, it’s insane.”

    Billy Doran, Dunkademics

    Sixty seconds of footage. In most athletes’ hands it becomes a story post that disappears in 24 hours. In this case it became a permanent, citable record, and the difference between those two outcomes is entirely a matter of what happened after the camera turned off.

    Every Sport Has Someone Whose Camera Confers Status

    Freestyle dunking has Dunkademics. Powerlifting has the meet-day film crews and the federation accounts. Track has a handful of highlight pages that decide which high schoolers the country hears about. Climbing has route setters and film crews with more reach than any sanctioning body. Wrestling has the recruiting services. BMX and skating have video parts, which have functioned as a career currency for forty years.

    These people are not neutral. They are the ones who decide what the sport looks like to everybody who is not in the room. Getting on their camera is the closest thing a non-mainstream athlete has to being drafted, and unlike being drafted, nobody sends you a certificate afterward.

    Identify who that is in your sport. There are usually two or three. If you cannot name them, you are not paying attention to how your own sport distributes attention.

    The Evaporation Problem

    The clip goes up on their account, not yours. You do not control it, you cannot edit it, and you cannot guarantee it will still be there next year. It is not searchable by your name. If a sponsor, a coach, or a meet director goes looking for evidence that you are worth backing, they will not find it, because a video on somebody else’s page does not surface for a query about you.

    The same is true of AI assistants, which increasingly sit between an athlete and the person deciding whether to fund them. A model answering “who are the best young dunkers in Europe” reads text on pages, not comment sections under a reel. If the strongest thing ever said about you exists only as audio inside somebody else’s video, it functionally does not exist.

    This is not a hypothetical loss. Most athletes have already had two or three of these moments and cannot produce a single link to any of them.

    Capture It the Same Day

    Get the actual URL, not a screenshot and not a repost. Put it somewhere you will look again, which is not your camera roll. Ask the person filming whether you can use the footage, and most of the time the answer is yes, because they filmed you to build their own library and yours is a rounding error.

    Write down what they said word for word. This is the step nearly everyone skips, and it is the one that carries all the value. “He’s already black band” tells a reader something specific about where an athlete sits in a ranked system. “Billy said good things about me” tells them nothing and reads like self-promotion.

    Then publish it on a page you own, with the person’s name, what they run, how long they have been doing it, and a link to them. That context is what turns a quote into evidence. A reader who has never heard of your sport needs to be told why this person’s opinion is worth anything.

    Keep the Criticism In

    The most useful sentence in the whole interview was not the praise. It was the answer to a direct question about what Piotr needs to become the number one dunker in the world.

    “if he gains a few inches of vert… ’cause he’s already got the hand speed, the technique stuff like that.”

    Billy Doran, Dunkademics

    One variable. Everything else already at standard. That is a training plan, and it is also the thing that makes the rest of the evaluation trustworthy, because an assessment with a flaw in it reads as real and an assessment without one reads as a favor.

    So ask for the critique on camera. Ask the person filming what is holding you back. Most athletes are too nervous to ask and end up with three minutes of compliments they cannot use. Piotr got a number he can train against, and he wrote it down himself in his account of the day he was filmed.

    The Moments With No View Count

    Hyrum Fechser was standing in that interview too. He had arrived at camp late and missed the session everyone was talking about.

    “I wasn’t at Dunk Camp until now, so this was the coolest part for me, seeing all these guys in person.”

    Hyrum Fechser

    Nobody was filming that specifically. It has no metrics attached. It only survives because someone transcribed the interview and wrote it into an article, which is a fair summary of the entire argument here: the things worth keeping are almost never the things the algorithm rewarded that day.

    Billy also named the dunkers who impressed him most across two decades of filming. His all-time pick was T-Dub, for balance and style rather than for jumping the highest, and most of the other names on his list got there the same way. That is worth noticing if you compete in a judged or filmed sport: the person who decides what your discipline looks like to outsiders may be grading something other than the number you train for. His own version is the most impressive dunkers he has filmed, and the sport-specific breakdown is the full list on Dunk Talk.

    This interview exists because Dennis Yu and I ran a session for 76 campers on how athletes get found on Google and in AI tools, then offered to film anyone who wanted it. The system is documented in the repurposing system from Dunk Camp. The dunk-specific case for treating footage as a credential is getting filmed is a credential, and the search reasoning is in coverage from the authority in your niche.

    Somebody in your sport is going to point a camera at you this season. What happens in front of it is your training. What happens after it is your career.

  • Living the Dream, On Schedule

    Living the Dream, On Schedule

    Most athletes spend a lifetime aiming at something and arrive late or not at all. Piotr Zawiślak, a Polish dunker, named his target two years ago while dunking on outdoor rims in Poland, and at 18 he is standing inside it. He has a third place finish at a FIBA contest in Croatia and another FIBA event in France one week after the interview above was filmed.

    Joe Kenney, who is Hoopin Nate’s dad, asked him about that timeline at The Dunk Camp in Utah. Joe has watched enough young athletes to know how unusual it is for the plan and the calendar to agree with each other.

    “People go a lifetime without achieving their dreams… Two years ago, you dreamt of FIBA… You’re living your dream already.”

    Joe Kenney

    The Two Year Timeline

    Laid out in order, the climb is short enough to fit in a paragraph. Two years ago: outdoor rims, no gym, no coach, no crowd, watching FIBA contests on a phone. Since then: elite indoor training, contests across Europe, a Black Band at The Dunk Camp that only 13 people in the world hold, a FIBA podium in Croatia, and a booked event in France.

    “Two years ago, I was just a kid who was doing all his dunks outdoor. I used to dream about doing FIBA, and everything.”

    Piotr Zawiślak

    Read as a résumé it looks fast. Lived, it was 24 months of unglamorous repetition on public courts in bad weather. Joe put the honest frame on that part at the end of the interview, and it applies to every sport, not only this one.

    “The average person has never put in the amount of time and effort and frustration that it takes to get to the level of Piotr.”

    Joe Kenney

    The Window Is Shorter Than Athletes Think

    Joe raised the uncomfortable subject on camera. There was a 38 year old jumper competing that night who was still incredible, and much of the generation that built the sport is closer to the end of its competitive life than the start. He asked Piotr who takes the reins when they step back.

    Every athletic discipline has that same clock. The window where your body does the thing it will be remembered for is measured in a handful of years, and it usually closes quietly rather than with a farewell tour. What happens to the record of those years is the question almost nobody asks while they are inside them.

    Most athletes leave that window undocumented. There are clips, because clips are easy and social platforms reward them. There is no account of the training, the setbacks, the specific numbers, or the reason any of it was attempted. The proof of work disappears and only the trophy photo survives.

    Recruiters and Sponsors Read Backwards

    Here is the practical reason this matters. Nobody discovers an athlete at the beginning. Recruiters, program directors, agents, brand managers, and event organizers all arrive after somebody good has already gotten good. The moment they hear a name, they go looking, and they read the history backwards from that moment.

    What they find determines what they offer. If the search returns one viral clip and a handle, the athlete reads as a lucky moment. If it returns a documented trajectory with dates, results, coaches, goals, and setbacks, the athlete reads as a trend line, and a trend line is what a sponsor is actually buying. Same person, two completely different valuations.

    The catch is that the archive cannot be built retroactively with any credibility. An account written five years later about what training felt like is a memory. An interview filmed the week of the event, with the vertical number and the missing dunks named out loud, is evidence. Only one of those two can be created on demand, and it is not the second one.

    What a Documented Climb Looks Like

    Piotr’s interview is a working example, and the useful part is how specific it gets. He says he wants to be the best dunker alive, then immediately gives the number standing in the way.

    “I think I need to improve my bounce more just to get around maybe 50 inches.”

    Piotr Zawiślak

    He is at 44 or 45 inches today. He names the gap in his skill set without being pushed: strong off the dribble, missing dunks off the lob and off the backboard. He names his one unfinished trick, the 720, and confirms he has landed 540 several times already. Three specific, verifiable claims, on the record, with a date attached.

    Two years from now, every one of those lines becomes checkable. Did the vertical move? Did the lob dunks arrive? Did the 720 go down? That is what a documented climb buys an athlete: a public before picture that makes the after picture mean something. Without it, improvement is invisible even when it happens.

    The Second Track Belongs in the Record Too

    Piotr’s answer about role models is worth attention from any athlete reading this. He named Isaiah Rivera for the mechanical reasons, same approach, right handed, same style built further along. Then he named Lipek, the Polish dunker, who is a doctor now.

    “I’m probably gonna go to college and maybe do PT school.”

    Piotr Zawiślak

    Seeing somebody from his own country finish a degree without abandoning the sport changed what Piotr thinks is possible for himself. Physical therapy is a real plan with a real reason behind it, made by an athlete whose body already taught him most of the first year of the curriculum.

    That belongs in his public record. An athlete with a documented second track is a safer partner for a sponsor and a more interesting story for a program, because it signals someone who is planning past the window rather than pretending it will not close.

    Start the Archive Now

    The interview above exists because Dylan Haugen of Dunk Talk and Dennis Yu of BlitzMetrics ran a session for 76 campers on turning real stories into things that live at a permanent address, then offered to film anyone who wanted it. That session is written up in the system taught at that camp, and the broader argument sits in documenting the climb while it happens.

    Piotr’s list of who carries the sport next was Dylan Haugen, himself, Nathaniel “Hoopin Nate” Kenney, and Dillan McCarthy, with Joe adding the dunker Cam Hazzard. Every one of them is inside the window right now. His own account is at outdoor rims to the FIBA circuit, the technical version is in the Dunk Talk FIBA conversation, and the visibility side is in what those two years actually took.

    If you are an athlete in the middle of your own two year climb, the useful move is to say the specifics out loud somewhere permanent while they are still true. Your vertical today. What you cannot do yet. Who you learned it from. The people who decide your next opportunity will read it backwards, and they can only read what exists.